He summarizes this “betrayal” in three summary points
* First, it has betrayed its statutory obligation to be impartial, using the excuse that any dissent from the official orthodoxy was so insignificant that it should just be ignored or made to look ridiculous.
* Second, it has betrayed the principles of responsible journalism, by allowing its coverage to become so one-sided that it has too often amounted to no more than propaganda.
* Third, it has betrayed the fundamental principles of science, which relies on unrelenting scepticism towards any theory until it can be shown to provide a comprehensive explanation for the observed evidence.
Judy Curry has posted
where she discusses their report among other topics. Her summary statement is
When science becomes politicized, we need journalists to be playing a watchdog role and not just parroting the words of scientists and their press releases.
I agree with her conclusion. I also would add that this politicization has permeated the leadership of professional societies including the American Geophysical Union; e.g. see
as well as funding agencies; e.g. see
The press is not the only group at fault as our professional societies and funding agencies are also failing to provide balanced assessments of the science.