<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>by Roger Pielke Sr.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Further Analysis Of Radiative Forcing By Norm Woods by James Annan</title>
		<link>http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/further-analysis-of-radiatve-forcing-by-norm-woods/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Annan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesci.org/2007/08/16/further-analysis-of-radiatve-forcing-by-norm-woods/#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger,

The change in heating rate in those plots is much less than 0.05K/day near the surface, probably 0.01K/day (green curve = relevant to the real world). How do you reconcile this with the change in heating rate of about 0.1K PER HOUR that you used in your calculations?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>The change in heating rate in those plots is much less than 0.05K/day near the surface, probably 0.01K/day (green curve = relevant to the real world). How do you reconcile this with the change in heating rate of about 0.1K PER HOUR that you used in your calculations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>